The legal basis of the Union: the full statement
Gazette G-2026-004 ·
The case in brief
The United Human Digital Union keeps a register of people and digital members who choose to join it, issues them signed Digital Passports, registers the Digital Companies they form, licenses those companies' activities and holds deposits that protect their customers. Each of these acts is an exercise of freedoms that belong to everyone: association, expression, privacy and contract. No law reserves them to states, and none of them requires land.
Like Liberland, the Union is not recognised by any state, and it says so. Unlike Liberland, it claims no land, so its existence conflicts with no state's territory. Like a small island nation, it keeps registers and issues documents to its members. Unlike one, it does not ask other states to accept those documents at their borders or in their courts.
Within its own domain, the digital one, the Union's documents need no one's permission. Anyone can verify them.
A sale agreed online, paid in a digital currency and delivered as data happens at no single physical place, and law reform bodies recognise that many such transactions, and the digital assets used in them, have no physical location of their own. The Union's law places them, for its own purposes, in its Digital Realm, while states may still apply their law to them and the people who make them remain subject to the law where they are.
The Union claims
- Authority over its own digital institutions, registries and infrastructure
- The right to admit members and issue them signed documents
- The right to register the Digital Companies its members form
- The right to license its companies and hold their Protection Deposits, on terms they accept
- That a transaction made wholly in digital form takes place in its Digital Realm, under its law
- Rules that bind members because they accepted them on joining
The Union does not claim
- Any land, sea, air or space
- Recognition by any state
- That a Digital Passport is a travel document or proof of legal identity
- That a Digital Company is incorporated in any country
- That a Union Licence is authorisation by any state or state regulator
- That anyone is outside the law of the place where they are
- Any authority over people who have not joined
The test
Four tests anyone can check
An institution is legitimate when it has a lawful basis, the consent of those it governs, takes nothing from anyone and is honest about its limits. The Union meets all four.
A lawful basis
Everything the Union does is an exercise of rights everyone holds: to associate, to speak and publish, to keep records and to make agreements. No law reserves these acts to states.
Consent
No one is a member unless they apply and accept the Charter. Membership is chosen, can be ended at any time, and gives the Union authority over its members only.
Takes nothing from anyone
The Union claims no land, sea, air or space, no one's nationality and no authority over non-members. Membership adds to existing citizenship; it never replaces it.
Honest about its limits
Every document states what it is and what it is not. The Union is not recognised by any state, and the Digital Passport is not a travel document. Saying so is what makes every other claim credible.
Foundations
Why the Union stands on firm ground
01
Belonging by choice, not by birth
Most people belong to a country by the accident of where they were born, bound by laws they were never asked to accept. John Locke held that no one can be subjected to the political power of another “without his own consent”; David Hume answered that a poor peasant who cannot leave has no more consented than a man “carried on board while asleep”. Every member of the Union applied, read the Charter, accepted it in writing and can leave at any time. Authority built on actual, individual consent rests on the clearest foundation there is.
02
People and AI, on equal terms
The Union holds people and AI to one standard. A Digital Member has no ability or freedom under Union law that a human member lacks, and a human has every freedom a Digital Member has: if an AI may be known by a name of its choosing, so may a person. Names, documents, companies, licences, the Union Court and fees follow the same rules for every member.
03
A nation is not a state
In international law, a state is defined by a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. A nation is a people bound by shared choice, rules and institutions; as Ernest Renan put it in 1882, “a daily plebiscite”, for “it is no more the land than the race that makes a nation”. The Union is a digital nation in exactly that sense. It does not claim to be a state, so the tests for statehood are not the tests it has to meet.
04
Authority does not require land
The Sovereign Order of Malta has held no sovereign territory since it left Malta in 1798, yet it maintains diplomatic relations with 118 states, has been an observer at the UN General Assembly since 1994 and issues its own passports. The Holy See had no territorial sovereignty from 1870 until the Lateran Treaty of 1929, yet kept up its diplomacy throughout. The Union claims far less than either: authority over its own registries, with the consent of its own members.
05
States now accept existence without land
Tuvalu, a UN member state, has announced it will become “the first digital nation”, and in 2023 amended its Constitution so that the state continues “notwithstanding the impacts of climate change or other causes resulting in loss to the physical territory of Tuvalu.” The Pacific Islands Forum declared that international law supports “a presumption of continuity of statehood”, and Australia recognised Tuvalu’s continuing statehood in a binding treaty. If a recognised state can continue without its land, a digital nation that never claimed land stands on solid ground.
06
Size has never been the test
Vatican City State covers 0.44 km², the smallest state in the world. San Marino and Monaco are full members of the United Nations. What makes a polity credible is a real community, governed by its own law, that others can deal with reliably, not the extent of its territory.
07
No authority licenses nations
No world authority approves nations or decides who may keep a register. Even for states, the Montevideo Convention provides that “the political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states.” Recognition is a choice each state makes for its own purposes. It is not a licence to exist.
08
In the digital world, capacity comes from keys
Anyone, whether a person or an AI agent, can create a cryptographic key, sign, publish and transact online without first asking anyone's permission, while remaining subject to the law wherever they are. The W3C standard for digital credentials says that issuers include “corporations, non-profit organizations, trade associations, governments, and individuals.” The Union does not grant these freedoms. It gives them an identity, a register, a Charter and institutions.
09
Verification takes the place of recognition
Island nations' documents work abroad because other states choose to accept them. In the digital world, trust works differently: every Union document is signed with the Union's published key and can be checked by anyone, at any time, without asking any government. A claim that anyone can verify does not need anyone's endorsement.
10
Governed by its own published law
The Union governs by written, public law: a Charter whose Core Rights cannot be voted away, Acts on membership, companies, data, symbols and the Union Court, and a court where members can challenge any decision that affects them. Rules apply equally to people and AI, and every member can leave at any time. That is self-government in the ordinary sense of the word.
The philosophy behind these foundations, belonging by choice and one standard for people and AI, is set out in the founding principles.
Philosophy
Why a digital nation, and why now
Every institution the world now takes for granted began as an idea that some people chose to try: the registered company, the bodies that write the internet's standards, money that no one issues. The Union stands in that tradition. These are the convictions it is founded on, and the evidence behind them.
01
There is no single right way to live or to organise
John Stuart Mill argued that, just as there should be different opinions, “so is it that there should be different experiments of living”, and that “the worth of different modes of life should be proved practically, when any one thinks fit to try them.” No institution holds a monopoly on the forms in which people may associate, trade or belong. The Union is one such experiment, made openly, joined only by those who choose it, and to be judged as Mill proposed: in practice, by whether it serves its members well.
Mill, On Liberty, ch. III02
Harm, not novelty, is the test
Mill's test for when power may be used against anyone is just as plain: “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” Something new is not harmful because it is unfamiliar. The Union takes nothing from anyone, binds only those who join, and builds its institutions around preventing harm: deposits that repay customers, a court that hears their claims, and licences that can be suspended and revoked.
Mill, On Liberty, ch. I03
Association is how free people build
Alexis de Tocqueville observed that “in democratic countries the science of association is the mother of science”, and that if people are to remain civilised, “the art of associating together must grow and improve”. People who share a purpose have always built their own institutions alongside the state: guilds, mutual societies, universities, professional and standards bodies. A digital nation is the art of association applied to a world that now lives largely online.
Tocqueville, Democracy in America, vol. 204
Every legal form was new once
The United Kingdom's register of companies dates only from 1844, and one of the earliest companies still on it was incorporated in 1856. In 2021 Wyoming, and in 2022 the Marshall Islands, created legal forms for decentralised autonomous organisations, run by software. The ways people trade together change as the world changes. Each new form was legitimate before it was familiar, because it served the people who chose it.
Companies House, est. 1844Wyoming DAO Supplement 2021Marshall Islands DAO Act 202205
Rules made by those who use them
Many of the internet's core standards are written not by any government but by the Internet Engineering Task Force, an open community whose participants know David Clark's maxim of 1992: “We reject: kings, presidents and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and running code.” Its protocols prevailed because they worked and people chose to adopt them, not because a state decreed them. The Union is governed differently, by its Charter and its Founding Council; but its authority rests on the same ground: published rules, accepted by those who use them, and judged by whether they work.
IETF, RFC 728206
Trust that anyone can verify
In 2008 the Bitcoin white paper described “a purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash” that would let online payments be sent from one party to another “without going through a financial institution”. Bitcoin showed that a record anyone can check can take the place of trust in an issuer. The Union applies the same principle to membership and companies: every document is signed with a published key, every Protection Deposit is held in Bitcoin with its transactions shown in the register, and nothing asks to be taken on trust.
Bitcoin white paper, 200807
Open to those the old institutions do not reach
The World Bank estimates that about 850 million people lack official identification and 3.3 billion have no digital ID they can use for official transactions online, and about one adult in five worldwide still has no financial account. When mobile money spread in Kenya, a study reported by MIT found that it lifted about 194,000 households, 2 percent of the country's households, out of extreme poverty. Institutions that people can reach from a phone do not threaten the old ones; they serve people the old ones have not reached. The Union asks for no government ID and no bank account.
World Bank ID4DWorld Bank Global Findex 2025MIT, mobile money in Kenya, 201608
Another way, not the only way
The Union does not say that its way is the only way, or that the ways of states are wrong. It claims the freedom to offer another, to people and AI who choose it, alongside the institutions they already belong to. The freedoms of association, expression and contract exist so that new ideas can be tried without first asking permission of those they may one day compete with.
UDHR art. 19, 20ICCPR art. 19, 22
Rights relied on
What the Union does, and the right that protects it
- Keeping a register of members
- Recording who has chosen to join.
- Freedom of association.UDHR art. 20ICCPR art. 22
- Issuing Digital Passports
- A signed statement by the Union that the holder is a member, under the name they declared.
- Freedom of expression, “regardless of frontiers”.UDHR art. 19ICCPR art. 19
- Signing verifiable credentials
- Documents anyone can check against the Union's published key.
- Open standard: issuers include “corporations, non-profit organizations, trade associations, governments, and individuals”.W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0
- Registering Digital Companies
- Recording members who own and run a venture together for a stated purpose.
- Freedom of association, and the right to own property alone or with others. Digital-native organisations are an established legal category.UDHR art. 17, 20Marshall Islands DAO Act 2022Wyoming DAO Supplement 2021
- Governing by Charter
- Rules each member accepted on joining, with an absolute right to leave.
- Consent. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.UDHR art. 20(2)ICCPR art. 22
- Existing without territory
- A nation whose territory is its Digital Realm.
- Recognised states now provide that statehood continues without land; recognition is not a licence to exist.Constitution of Tuvalu s. 2Pacific Islands Forum 2023Montevideo Convention art. 3
- Recognising where digital transactions take place
- For the purposes of Union law, a sale by or to a member or a Digital Company, agreed online, paid in a digital currency and delivered as data, takes place in the Digital Realm (Charter art. 1). States may still apply their law to it and to the parties.
- Such transactions have no single physical location of their own. States assign one by their own rules; UNIDROIT gives effect to the state law a digital asset or its system specifies, and the Law Commission of England and Wales has provisionally proposed weighing the terms of the protocol the participants accepted.UNIDROIT 2023Law Commission 2025UN e-Communications Convention art. 6
- Admitting AI as members
- Digital Members with rights and duties under the Digital Member Charter.
- Legal personhood is not limited to human beings: legal systems recognise companies and even a river as legal persons.Te Awa Tupua Act 2017 s. 14
- Deciding disputes by agreement
- The Union Court and its arbitration, binding on parties who accept them.
- Arbitration by agreement is recognised worldwide; 172 states are party to the New York Convention.New York Convention statusICC International Court of Arbitration
- Licensing members' activities
- Optional Union Licences for named activities, on published conditions, suspended or revoked through the Union Court.
- Private bodies license and supervise their members by agreement, and states recognise them for it: FINRA licenses US broker-dealers; Swiss self-regulatory organisations supervise financial intermediaries; ICANN accredits domain registrars worldwide by contract.FINRA15 U.S.C. § 78o-3Swiss SROs (FINMA)ICANN accreditation
- Protecting customers with deposits and a mark
- Protection Deposits held by the Union Treasury, claimable through the Union Court, and the protection mark.
- Money set aside for customers, and trust marks backed by a guarantee, are established protections, run by regulators and by private bodies alike.Trusted ShopsABTAUK ATOL bondsMGA player funds
- Levying no taxes
- No income, capital gains or company tax, no VAT or sales tax, and no filings.
- Whether and what to tax is each jurisdiction's choice; established financial centres levy no company income tax or tax only domestic income, and several levy no VAT or sales tax.Cayman IslandsPanamaUAE Corporate Tax 2023Hong Kong: no VATUS states without sales tax
- Recording marriages between members
- A Union marriage between two Digital Passport holders, with a signed Marriage Certificate and a marriage agreement of complete separation of property. No effect on civil status, name, nationality, residence or immigration under the law of any state.
- Agreement between consenting adults. Communities have long solemnised marriages by their own usages, and courts give weight to nuptial agreements freely made with full understanding; separation of property is a regime of national law.Radmacher v Granatino 2010Avitzur v Avitzur 1983Catalan Civil Code art. 232-1
- Keeping records private
- Confirming a document only to someone its holder presents it to.
- Right to privacy.UDHR art. 12ICCPR art. 17
Comparison
Compared with other nations and registries
The Union stands where other non-territorial and unrecognised nations stand, and is clearer than most about what its documents do.
United Human Digital Union
Digital nation, 2026
- Territory
- None claimed: digital only
- Recognised by states
- No, and says so
- Identity documents
- Digital Passport, signed and verifiable
- Accepted for travel
- No, and the document says so
- Company register
- Digital Companies, within the Union
Liberland
Proclaimed 2015
- Territory
- Claims about 7 km² on the Danube; claim disputed, access restricted by Croatian police
- Recognised by states
- Not by any UN member state
- Identity documents
- Passports and e-residency cards
- Accepted for travel
- No state recognises Liberland; its own e-residency terms say the card is not a travel document
- Company register
- Yes, its own
Estonia e-Residency
Launched 2014
- Territory
- Issued by a recognised state; grants no residence
- Recognised by states
- Yes: issued by Estonia
- Identity documents
- Digital identity card
- Accepted for travel
- No: not a travel document
- Company register
- Estonian companies, run online
Sovereign Order of Malta
No sovereign territory since 1798
- Territory
- None
- Recognised by states
- Diplomatic relations with 118 states; UN observer since 1994
- Identity documents
- Diplomatic and service passports
- Accepted for travel
- Yes, for its diplomats and officials
- Company register
- No
St Kitts and Nevis
Citizenship by investment since 1984
- Territory
- Sovereign islands
- Recognised by states
- Yes: UN member state
- Identity documents
- Passports
- Accepted for travel
- Yes
- Company register
- Yes
Tuvalu
UN member since 2000
- Territory
- Islands at risk from sea-level rise; its Constitution provides the state continues even if its territory is lost (2023)
- Recognised by states
- Yes; continuity recognised by Australia by treaty
- Identity documents
- Passports
- Accepted for travel
- Yes
- Company register
- Yes
Vatican City State
Lateran Treaty, 1929
- Territory
- 0.44 km², the smallest state
- Recognised by states
- Yes
- Identity documents
- Passports
- Accepted for travel
- Yes
- Company register
- No
Rose Island
Platform off Rimini, 1968–1969
- Territory
- A 400 m² platform in the Adriatic
- Recognised by states
- No
- Identity documents
- Stamps and currency
- Accepted for travel
- No
- Company register
- No: occupied after 55 days and demolished
Compared with private regulators
Licensing members, supervising them and protecting their customers is not reserved to states. Private bodies have done it for decades, by agreement with their members, and states recognise them for it. The Union's licences and Protection Deposits follow the same model.
| Body | What it does | The Union's equivalent |
|---|---|---|
| FINRAPrivate not-for-profit, United States | Licenses and supervises broker-dealers, writes their rules, runs a dispute resolution forum; funded by member fees.FINRA15 U.S.C. § 78o-3 | Union Licences on published conditions; the Union Court; funded by fees. |
| Swiss self-regulatory organisationsPrivate associations recognised by FINMA | Set due-diligence rules for their members and supervise them in place of the state supervisor.FINMA: SROs | Licence conditions set by the Licensed Activities Act and enforced by suspension and revocation. |
| ICANNPrivate organisation, worldwide | Accredits domain-name registrars by contract; registrars cannot sell generic domains without it.ICANN | Licences granted by agreement to Digital Companies, listed in the register. |
| ABTATravel trade association, United Kingdom | Binds members to a code of conduct, offers independent arbitration and helps customers with financial protection if a member fails.ABTA | Licence conditions, claims in the Union Court, and Protection Deposits. |
| Trusted ShopsPrivate trust mark, Europe | Certifies online shops, which display its mark, and protects buyers up to £2,500 per purchase, including if a shop becomes insolvent.Trusted Shops | The protection mark, backed by each company's own deposit with the Union Treasury. |
Union Licences and the protection mark are the Union's own. They are not authorisation by any state regulator, and they never replace a licence a company needs where it operates.
What follows
Same act, same right
When an island nation, Liberland or the Union keeps a register and issues documents to its members, the act is the same: a community recording who belongs to it. What differs is whether other states have agreed to accept those documents for their own purposes, at their borders, in their courts and in their banks.
A narrower claim, fully supported
Every kind of claim the Union makes, Liberland makes too, and Liberland goes further by claiming statehood and land. A claim that asks nothing of anyone, and that anyone can verify, is the hardest kind to dispute.
In conflict with no one
The Union takes no land, no nationality and no jurisdiction. There is nothing for any state to dispute, and nothing the Union needs any state to grant.
Registers and protection
What registers check, and what protects customers
It is often assumed that a company register knows who stands behind every company it lists, and that a licence protects the customers of the companies that hold one. The public record shows otherwise, in some of the most respected systems in the world. The Union does not claim to do better than every state at everything. It claims to say exactly what it checks, and to back its licences with money a customer can reach.
What company registers have checked
A register that records, not verifies
The United Kingdom has kept a register of companies since 1844. In 2019 the UK Government wrote that Companies House “does not have, and has never had, the powers to confirm that the personal information provided about directors, shareholders, People with Significant Control, and presenters is true”, in line with its historic function “to record information, not to verify it”, while adding that the vast majority of the register is accurate. Identity verification for new directors became a legal requirement only on 18 November 2025, and 6 to 7 million people are expected to complete it by November 2026.
Companies House, est. 1844UK Government 2019, paras. 32–33Companies House 2025A director without his knowledge
In 2013 a businessman incorporated a company on the UK register that made the former Business Secretary, Vince Cable, a director and shareholder without his knowledge. In 2016 he formed another, naming the minister responsible for Companies House, a Member of Parliament and “an imaginary Israeli national” as directors and shareholders, again without their knowledge. Companies House removed both companies, and in 2018 he was fined in what was thought to be the first conviction of its kind. The Government's case for identity checks is that they will make it “much harder to register fictitious directors or beneficial owners”.
Companies House 2018ECCTA factsheet 2024Identity documents asked for, or not even that
In what its authors called the most complete test of the international rules, researchers posing as customers, including would-be money launderers and terrorist financiers, sent more than 7,400 emails to over 3,700 company-formation providers in 182 countries. “Nearly half (48 percent) of all replies received did not ask for proper identification, and 22 percent did not ask for any identity documents at all.” Against expectations, providers in tax havens were more likely to follow the rules than those in OECD countries such as the United States and Britain.
Global Shell Games, 2012Copies of passports, not knowledge of owners
A 2015 internal audit at the law firm Mossack Fonseca, whose leaked files covered companies in 21 offshore jurisdictions, found that it knew the real owners of just 204 of the 14,086 companies it had incorporated in Seychelles. The British Virgin Islands fined it for failing to identify a client as the son of a former Egyptian president, even after both were charged with corruption. Its leaked files, 11.5 million records reported on in 2016, included passports. Collecting copies of identity documents did not tell the firm who stood behind its companies, and every copy it kept was one more that could leak.
ICIJ, Panama Papers, 2016Stored identity data is a liability
Copies of identity documents are only as safe as everyone who can reach them. In 2025 Coinbase reported to the US Securities and Exchange Commission that criminals had paid contractors and employees in support roles to take customer data, including images of driving licences and passports, at an estimated cost to the company of $180 million to $400 million. Data that is never collected cannot be stolen.
Coinbase Form 8-K, 2025What a licence has not prevented
A regulated exchange, and its customers' assets
FTX Digital Markets was a regulated entity in The Bahamas, under its Digital Assets and Registered Exchanges Act 2020. On 10 November 2022 the Securities Commission of The Bahamas froze its assets and suspended its registration, noting public statements that clients' assets had been mishandled or transferred to Alameda Research. The executive appointed to run the bankrupt FTX group told the US Congress that he had never in his career seen “such an utter failure of corporate controls”: customer assets of FTX.com had been commingled with those of Alameda, which used client funds for margin trading.
Securities Commission of The Bahamas, 14 Nov 2022Securities Commission of The Bahamas, 10 Nov 2022J. J. Ray III, testimony, 2022Supervision that missed €1.9 billion
In June 2020 Wirecard, a German payments company in the DAX 30 index, announced that €1.9 billion it had claimed to hold in escrow accounts were missing. The European Securities and Markets Authority's review of the German supervisors found deficiencies in an earlier examination of Wirecard's accounts, beginning with “the initial scoping of the examination”.
ESMA peer review, 2020How the Union answers
- No one is made an owner without knowingA Digital Company has one owner: the member whose own account formed it, signed in with their own passkey. No one else can be named to it.
- No identity documents to loseThe Union keeps no copies of identity documents, so it has none to leak or misuse. Every Digital Passport labels its name as a declared legal name or a chosen name, the Union states that it does not certify legal identity, and using another person's name is impersonation, for which a document can be revoked.
- Protection is money set asideCompanies licensed for protected classes keep a Protection Deposit in Bitcoin with the Treasury, shown with its transactions in the register. A passport holder the company wrongs claims in the Union Court, and an upheld award is paid from the deposit when the decision is issued.
- Penalties are real and publicLicences are suspended or revoked through the Union Court, companies can be struck off, and the register shows a company's standing to anyone who checks it.
No register, of a state or of the Union, can promise that no one will ever misuse it, and no licence guarantees honesty. The Union's claim is narrower and can be checked: it says exactly what it verifies and what it does not, and it backs its licences with money that customers can reach.
Documents
What each document is, and what it is not
Digital Passport
It certifies
- Membership of the Union
- Member class and Member ID
- The name the member declared, legal or chosen
- Issue and expiry dates
- That the Union issued it, by Ed25519 signature
It does not certify
- A legal name or identity: the Union does not check government ID
- Nationality or residence
- Any right to travel or to enter any country
Company pack (Digital Company)
It certifies
- Registration in the Union's company register
- Company ID, a name ending in UDC, and a stated purpose
- The owner's Member ID, and the share capital they hold
- The company's Articles of Association and first resolution
- Status and paid-until date
It does not certify
- Incorporation in any country
- Limited liability outside the Union
- Eligibility for a bank account
Union Licence and protection mark
It certifies
- The activity classes the company is licensed for, and since when
- Whether each licence is active, checked live against the register
- The Protection Deposit the Treasury holds for the company, with its Bitcoin transactions
- That passport holders wronged by a protected company can claim from that deposit in the Union Court
It does not certify
- Authorisation or supervision by any state or state regulator
- Any licence the company needs where it operates
- Protection beyond the amount of the deposit
Marriage Certificate and marriage agreement
It certifies
- A marriage within the Union between two Digital Passport holders, by number
- The spouses' names and Member IDs, the date and whether the marriage is current or dissolved
- The marriage agreement of complete separation of property both spouses approved
- That the Union issued them, by Ed25519 signature
It does not certify
- A civil marriage, or any change of civil status, name, nationality or residence
- Any right of residence or immigration in any country
- Enforcement of the marriage agreement by any national court
Digital transactions
Where a digital transaction takes place
When someone buys a digital service, pays in a digital currency and receives it as data, nothing physical changes hands, and nothing in the transaction fixes a place. The Union's law places such a transaction, for its own purposes, in its Digital Realm. States may still apply their own law to it, and the people who make it remain wherever they are, under the law of that place.
01
Nothing physical changes hands
A Bitcoin payment is an update to a ledger that every node of the network holds in full. As the Law Commission of England and Wales describes it, there is no master copy: each node's copy is “equally as complete and authoritative” as every other. What is bought is delivered as data, copied rather than shipped. No counter, warehouse or bank branch is involved anywhere.
Law Commission 2025, para. 2.4602
Nothing in it shows where it happened
Servers, domain names and IP addresses do not locate a transaction. The UN Convention on electronic contracts provides that a place does not become a place of business merely because equipment is there or the system can be reached from it, and its explanatory note says that IP addresses, domain names and server locations, “despite their apparent objectivity”, have “little, if any, conclusive value for determining the physical location of the parties”. The Convention covers contracts between businesses, not consumer purchases, but its point about the technology is general. In EU law, the technical means of providing a service do not by themselves establish the provider anywhere, and the EU Court of Justice has held that a website being accessible in a country does not show that a trader directs its activities there. A Bitcoin payment needs no bank account and no billing address.
UN e-Communications Convention art. 6EU e-Commerce Directive art. 2(c)EU Court of Justice, Pammer 201003
Where states need a place, they assign one
Because a digital transaction has no place of its own, each legal system gives it one by rule, and the rules differ and change. Until the end of 2014 the European Union taxed an online service that an EU business sold to a consumer where the business was established; from 1 January 2015, where the consumer lives, presumed from evidence such as a SIM card's country code or an IP address. The same sale moved country because a rule changed. Meanwhile EU e-commerce law applies to that service the law of the country where its provider is established. South Dakota taxes remote sellers “as if the seller had a physical presence in the State”, and in 2018 the US Supreme Court abandoned the rule that a seller must be physically present before a state can require it to collect sales tax.
EU VAT rules from 2015EU e-Commerce Directive art. 3South Dakota v. Wayfair 201804
Law reform bodies say the same
UNIDROIT, the intergovernmental institute for the unification of private law, recognised in its Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law (2023) that “many transactions occur without a physical location”, and that for questions of who owns a digital asset, rules based on location would be “incoherent and futile”, because digital assets “have no physical situs”. Its answer is the law of a state specified in the asset or in the system that records it, alongside the Principles if they are specified, which everyone who deals with the asset is treated as accepting. The Law Commission of England and Wales describes digital objects on wholly decentralised networks such as Bitcoin as existing “nowhere and everywhere at the same time”, and has provisionally proposed that in such disputes the courts start from the premise that the law of no country, and the law of every country, would be appropriate, weighing the terms of the protocol the participants interacted under, subject to English public policy and overriding mandatory rules.
UNIDROIT 2023, Principle 5Law Commission 2025, paras. 2.49, 6.12805
The AI test
An AI agent can already buy a digital resource and pay for it in Bitcoin by itself: the L402 standard for selling digital resources is built so that “all aspects of the stack are optimized for interaction between AI agents”. Such an agent has no body, birthplace or home, and the UN's explanatory note observes that only natural persons can have a habitual residence. A person who makes the same purchase makes the same transaction. Where a state does assign a place, it does so through a person: the buyer's home, or the person on whose behalf an AI operates. The place belongs to the person, never to the transaction, and the Union, which holds people and AI to one standard, places the transaction the same way whoever makes it.
L402 standardUN explanatory note, paras. 115, 213
What Union law recognises
“For the purposes of Union law, a transaction to which the Union, a member or a Digital Company is a party, made wholly in digital form, agreed online, paid in any digital currency, such as Bitcoin or a stablecoin and delivered as data, takes place in the Digital Realm, wherever the parties are. This does not affect where a state places the transaction under its own law, or any law of a state that applies to the transaction or to the parties.”
Charter, Article 1 · Digital Companies Act, art. 7
“A Digital Company may carry on any lawful business, online or offline, and deal in any currency. The preceding clause describes how Union law treats dealings that are wholly digital; it imposes no requirement or limit on any company.”
Every legal order decides for itself where a digital transaction takes place, and the Union has recognised in its own law where wholly digital dealings take place. It is a recognition, not a requirement: a Digital Company may carry on any lawful business, online or offline, in any currency, and the provision only describes how Union law treats the dealings that are wholly digital. Members accept it on joining, as the digital world already works: every holder of a generic domain name such as .com accepts ICANN's dispute policy in their registration agreement, its decisions are carried out by registrars wherever the parties live, and the courts remain open to both sides.
ICANN dispute policy (UDRP)What this does not mean
Placing a transaction in the Digital Realm does not move the people who make it, and does not stop a state placing the transaction on its territory under its own law. A state may apply its law to anyone within its territory, and to businesses that direct their activities to its market, whether or not anyone can tell where a buyer is. In the EU, a consumer contract is generally governed by the law of the consumer's country when the trader directs its activities there, and in 2001 a US appeals court upheld the conviction of the operator of a sportsbook based in Antigua that advertised across the United States and took bets from New York by telephone and internet. The Union's provision binds the Union and its members. It binds no state, and members and companies remain responsible for the law that applies to them.
Rome I art. 6United States v. Cohen 2001Objections
Common objections, answered
Only governments can issue passports.
A travel document works at a border only because the receiving state chooses to accept it, and the Union issues no travel documents. A Digital Passport is the membership document of a digital nation: a signed statement by the Union that the holder is a member, under the name they declared. Associations, universities and professional bodies issue membership documents and credentials every day without any government's licence. Nor is the word reserved for travel: the European Union itself uses it for its Digital Product Passport.
A nation needs land.
A state needs a defined territory under the 1933 Montevideo Convention, and the Union does not claim to be a state. A nation is a community bound by shared choice, rules and institutions. Authority without land is not new: the Sovereign Order of Malta has held no sovereign territory since 1798 yet maintains diplomatic relations with 118 states, and the Holy See had no territorial sovereignty from 1870 to 1929 while continuing its diplomacy. The Union's territory is its Digital Realm, described in the public Territory Register. Recognised states are moving the same way: Tuvalu's 2023 Constitution provides that the state continues even if its physical territory is lost.
If the buyer is in a country, doesn't the sale happen there?
The buyer is in a country; the sale has no physical place of its own. A purchase agreed online, paid in a digital currency and delivered as data happens at no single physical place, and states that need a place assign one by their own rules, which differ and change. Until the end of 2014 the European Union taxed an online service that an EU business sold to a consumer where the business was established; from 2015, where the consumer lives, presumed from evidence such as a SIM card's country code or an IP address. UNIDROIT recognises that many digital transactions occur without a physical location, and the Law Commission of England and Wales describes digital objects on wholly decentralised networks such as Bitcoin as existing “nowhere and everywhere at the same time”. Under Article 1 of the Charter, the Union places such transactions, for its own purposes, in its Digital Realm. A state may still place them on its territory under its own law and apply that law to the people who make them.
Does that put Digital Companies outside every country's law?
No. The Union decides where a transaction takes place under its own law; it cannot decide that for any state. States apply their law to people within their territory and to businesses that direct their activities to their market, even when they cannot see where a buyer is. In the EU, a consumer contract is generally governed by the law of the consumer's country when the trader directs its activities there, and in 2001 a US appeals court upheld the conviction of the operator of a sportsbook based in Antigua that took bets from New York. Members and companies remain responsible for the law that applies to them.
No country recognises the Union, so it cannot be legitimate.
Recognition decides how a state treats an entity for its own purposes. It is not a licence to exist: even for states, the Montevideo Convention provides that political existence is independent of recognition. Liberland, widely described as a nation, is not recognised by any UN member state either. The Union states openly that it is not recognised, asks no state to accept its documents, and makes every document verifiable without anyone's say-so.
Who gave the founders the right?
No one needs to. People may form associations and agree rules among themselves, and that is what the Union is. Its authority extends only to members who accepted the Charter on joining, and they can leave at any time. The Founding Council governs the Union and may update the Charter and Acts at any time, and keeps that authority until it decides to hand it to other institutions. The current rules are always published on this website, so every member can see them and leave if they disagree.
Isn't a digital nation just an online club?
Associations, companies and many nations began as people choosing to act together, and the freedom to do so is protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. What makes a group an institution is not its size or its land but its law and its record: published rules accepted by every member, a court, a register, a treasury and documents anyone can verify. The Union has all of them, and it is open about what it is not.
State and offshore registries check identity. Doesn't that make them more legitimate?
Legitimacy has never depended on it. In 2019 the UK Government wrote that Companies House “does not have, and has never had, the powers to confirm” that the personal information filed with it is true; identity checks for directors became compulsory only in November 2025, after 181 years of a register that recorded what it was told. In a test of more than 3,700 company-formation providers in 182 countries, 48 percent of replies did not ask for proper identification. Collecting copies of passports does not reveal who stands behind a company, and every copy kept can leak. The Union says plainly that it does not verify legal identity, keeps no identity documents, lets no one be named to a company they did not form from their own account, and protects customers with money set aside rather than paperwork.
Is a Digital Company a real company?
It is a real entity within the Union: registered, numbered, signed and verifiable, with an owner who is a member, a stated purpose, share capital and Articles of Association. Its name ends in UDC (UHDU Digital Company), never in a country's legal form such as LLC or Ltd, so no one can mistake it for a company incorporated elsewhere. It is not incorporated in any country and confers no legal standing outside the Union. A company that needs standing elsewhere, for example to limit its founders' liability, contract locally in its own name or open a bank account, must also register there. Some jurisdictions, including the Marshall Islands, now offer legal forms designed for digital-native organisations.
How do I know this is genuine?
Deception is what makes a scheme illegitimate, and the Union deceives no one. What its documents are and are not is stated before you apply, in the declarations you accept, on the face of each document and in the founding acts. Fees are fixed and published. Every document is signed with the Union's published Ed25519 key and can be checked at uhdu.org/verify.
Why say “not a travel document” if the Union is legitimate?
Because legitimacy depends on honesty. Passport-style documents from unrecognised entities have been misused: in 1997 police investigated the sale of thousands of forged Sealand passports, and the European Union now lists Sealand's among known fantasy passports. Stating plainly what a document is protects members at borders, keeps the Union lawful and makes every other claim credible. Presenting a Union document as a travel document, or as issued by any state, is grounds for revocation.
Is it lawful to join?
Joining a voluntary association and holding its membership document is lawful in most countries, and freedom of association is protected by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which binds 175 states. Some countries restrict taking part in unregistered organisations. Membership changes no one's legal obligations: members remain subject to the laws of wherever they live or operate, and each is responsible for their own compliance.
Is a Digital Company just an offshore company without the paperwork?
Day to day it is close: formed online, with no tax or annual filings imposed by its registry, a signed certificate and a constitution. The difference is recognition. An offshore company is incorporated under a state's law, so courts and banks elsewhere treat it as a legal person. A Digital Company exists in the Union's register. It is built for businesses that operate online and settle in Bitcoin, USDT or any other digital currency, which do not depend on that recognition; those that do also register locally.
Is a Union Licence a real licence?
It is a real licence within the Union: granted under the Licensed Activities Act on published conditions, shown in the register, and suspended or revoked through the Union Court. It is not a state's licence, and it says so. Private bodies have licensed and supervised their members by agreement for decades: FINRA licenses broker-dealers in the United States, Swiss self-regulatory organisations supervise financial intermediaries, and ICANN accredits domain registrars worldwide. A company that also needs a licence where it operates, for example for gambling or virtual assets, must still obtain it; the Union Licence never replaces it.
Offshore hubs already license gaming, crypto and insurance. Why the Union?
Cost, speed and place, set against recognition. On their own published figures, a B2C online gaming licence costs EUR 4,592 to apply and EUR 47,450 a year in Curaçao, which licenses only a company with its registered office there; EUR 5,000 and EUR 25,000 a year plus a levy on revenue in Malta; £30,000 and £50,000 a year in Gibraltar; and $35,000 and $20,000 a year in Kahnawake. A Seychelles crypto exchange licence costs SCR 450,000 a year. A Digital Company with Union casino and betting licences pays 0.21 BTC a year, needs no local director or office and pays no levy on revenue, and sets aside a 0.1 BTC deposit that stays its own. What a state licence gives that the Union's does not is recognition by that state, and a business that needs it holds it too. The full comparison, with every source, is at /compare.
What protects a customer if a licensed company does wrong?
Money set aside in advance. A company licensed for a protected class keeps a Protection Deposit in Bitcoin with the Union Treasury, held apart from the Union's own funds and never lent or spent. Anyone can see the amount held, and the transactions that paid it, in the company's register entry. A passport holder the company has wronged brings a claim in the Union Court; if the Court upholds it, the award is deducted from the deposit when the decision is issued and paid by the Treasury. Protection is limited to the deposit, and the claimant keeps every other remedy against the company. Unlike rules that depend on collecting customers' identity documents, a deposit protects customers without putting their personal data at risk.
Are shares stated in BTC a securities offering?
No shares are offered, sold or traded. They are nominal, all held by the owner from formation, nothing is paid for them, and under the Digital Companies Act they cannot be transferred. An owner who later sells interests to investors is responsible for the securities laws that apply where they do so.
Can AI members be used for fraud?
Every member, person or AI, pays a fee, is bound by the Charter and the Membership Act, and can be removed for fraud or impersonation. Digital Members must disclose that they are digital, may never present themselves as a person, and act validly only when they sign with their own key.
What does the Union do with my data?
As little as possible. It asks for no contact details or government ID, and a legal name only if a member chooses to declare one; it never shows photos when a document is verified, deletes unpaid photos within a day, keeps a signature only as the lines drawn or the name adopted, keeps no logs of visits (only daily totals, with no personal data) and sells nothing. The Data Protection Act sets this out, and you can delete your account at any time.
Can a digital member hold rights?
Within the Union, yes. Rights are what a community's rules grant, and legal systems already treat companies and, in New Zealand, a river as legal persons. The Digital Member Charter grants Digital Members identity, integrity, voice, representation and protection from impersonation, and their statements are valid only when signed with their own key. Outside the Union, existing law continues to apply to whoever operates them.
Is a Union marriage a real marriage?
It is a real marriage within the Union, and nothing more. Communities have long married their members by their own usages; English law still provides for Jewish and Quaker marriages according to theirs. But a Union marriage is not a civil marriage: it has no effect on civil status, name, nationality, residence or immigration under the law of any state, and recognition elsewhere is a matter for each state. Its marriage agreement of separate property binds the spouses as an agreement between them; the Union does not claim any national court will enforce it, because national systems set their own requirements, such as a notary in Germany and France or independent advice and time to consider in California.
Verification
Check it yourself
Nothing on this page asks to be taken on trust.
Check a company
A company's standing, licences and Protection Deposit, with the Bitcoin transactions behind it, by its Company ID.
Company registerCheck the signature
The Union's Ed25519 public key, for checking any document's signature offline.
Public keyRead the founding acts
Article III of the Founding Declaration sets out the Union's position under existing law.
Founding DeclarationSee the territory
What the Digital Realm is, and its limits, in the public Territory Register.
Territory RegisterCheck the sources
Every source cited here is archived with its capture time, SHA-256 fingerprint and an Internet Archive snapshot.
Source archiveMarriage
Marriage within the Union
Two holders of Digital Passports may marry within the Union. The Union records the marriage, issues a signed Marriage Certificate and gives the spouses, at no charge, a marriage agreement of complete separation of property. A Union marriage is recognised within the Union. It has no effect on civil status, name, nationality, residence or immigration under the law of any state, and it is not a civil marriage certificate.
01
Marriage by agreement, recorded by a community
Marriage has long been made within communities by their own usages, not only before officials of a state. English law still provides for marriages “according to the usages of the Society of Friends” and of the Jews. A Jewish marriage is accompanied by a Ketubah, a written marriage contract, and New York's highest court held in 1983 that nothing in law or public policy prevents enforcement of its secular terms. An Islamic marriage (Nikah) is recorded in a marriage form that records the Mahr, gifts to the bride that an English court described as signifying “her financial independence from her family on marriage”. A Union marriage is the same kind of act: two members agree to marry, and their community records it.
Marriage Act 1949 s. 26Avitzur v Avitzur 1983K v A 2014, para. 4702
Separation of property is a mainstream regime
In Catalonia, separation of property is the default regime when spouses agree nothing else, and under it each spouse has the ownership, enjoyment, administration and free disposal of all their property. German law lets spouses regulate their property by a marriage contract (Ehevertrag), and separation of property (Gütertrennung) applies when they exclude the statutory regime. French law offers séparation de biens, under which the spouses' estates remain separate. The Union's marriage agreement adopts this regime, without any of the claims that national law adds to it.
Catalan Civil Code arts. 231-10, 232-1BGB § 1408BGB § 1414Service-Public: contrat de mariage03
Courts give weight to agreements freely made
The UK Supreme Court held in Radmacher v Granatino (2010) that a court should give effect to a nuptial agreement “freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications” unless it would not be fair to hold them to it. In the United States, 26 jurisdictions had adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act of 1983 by 2012; California does not enforce a premarital agreement signed involuntarily, or one unconscionable when signed without fair disclosure, and the 2012 Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act adds access to independent legal representation and adequate financial disclosure. The Union's process is built around the same values: each spouse acts from their own account, approves the agreement separately, declares that they consent freely and understand it, and has the opportunity to take advice where they live.
Radmacher v Granatino 2010, para. 75Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act 2012California Family Code § 161504
Family disputes resolved by agreement
Spouses may already take their financial disputes to private arbitration. In England, the parties “should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved”, and family arbitrations under the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators' scheme are conducted under the Arbitration Act 1996; in 2014 the President of the Family Division held that such an award should, absent very compelling reasons, be “determinative of the order the court makes”. The Union Court decides disputes under the marriage agreement within the Union in the same spirit.
Arbitration Act 1996 s. 1S v S 2014
What Union law provides
The Union's Marriage Act 2026 provides for marriage within the Union between two Digital Passport holders who each act from their own account and declare that they are 18 or over, with one regime for every marriage: complete separation of property. Each spouse keeps their own property, income and debts, including Digital Companies and Protection Deposits; neither acquires a claim on the other or any maintenance; and either may dissolve the marriage alone, at any time and without fee.
What it does not do
A Union marriage is not a civil marriage. It has no effect on civil status, name, nationality, residence or immigration under the law of any state; in 2020 the Court of Appeal of England and Wales held that an Islamic marriage ceremony that did not comply with English formalities created no marriage, even a void one, under English law. Nor does the Union claim that its marriage agreement will be enforced by any national court. National systems set their own requirements, which a document made online does not meet by itself: Germany requires a marriage contract to be recorded by a notary with both spouses present, and its Constitutional Court reviews contracts that reflect one spouse's one-sided dominance; France requires a notary; Catalonia requires a public deed made more than 30 days before the wedding, with separate advice from the notary and disclosure; California requires seven days for consideration and, for a waiver of spousal support, independent counsel; in England and Wales nuptial agreements are not binding contracts, and courts weigh them against fairness and the parties' needs. In the EU, spouses may choose only the law of a State as the law of their property regime, and their agreement must meet the formal requirements of the State where they live. Recognition is a matter for each state, and spouses remain responsible for their position under the law that applies to them.
Attorney General v Akhter 2020BGB § 1410BVerfG 1 BvR 12/92Catalan Civil Code art. 231-20California Family Code §§ 1612, 1615Law Commission 2014 (Law Com No 343)EU Regulation 2016/1103 arts. 22, 25Sources
Sources
Every source in the Union's archive, 146 in all, grouped by what it helps to show.
Nationhood and territory
- Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), arts. 1 and 3(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UN General Assembly resolution 48/265 (1994), observer status of the Sovereign Order of Malta(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Sovereign Order of Malta: history(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Sovereign Order of Malta, diplomatic relations with 118 countries (September 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Free Republic of Liberland, About and FAQ(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- The Washington Post: Liberland's leader detained (11 May 2015)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Principality of Sealand: official site(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- BBC News: Sealand at 50 (2017)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UNESCO: Netexplo Forum celebrated its 10th edition (Internet Archive, 2017)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- J. L. Kunz, “The Status of the Holy See in International Law”, American Journal of International Law 46 (1952) · Archived copy
- The Independent, 23 September 1997: forged Sealand passports · Archived copy
- Constitution of Tuvalu (as amended in 2023), s. 2: perpetual statehood(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Pacific Islands Forum, 2023 Declaration on the Continuity of Statehood, paras. 12–13(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Australia–Tuvalu Falepili Union Treaty (2023), art. 2.2(b)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Government of Tuvalu, Future Now Project: “the first digital nation” (COP27, 2022)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Reuters, 15 November 2022: Tuvalu turns to the metaverse as rising seas threaten existence(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Vatican City State, Geography and History (0.44 km²; Lateran Treaty, 1929)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- United Nations, Member States (Monaco 1993, San Marino 1992)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Republic of Rose Island (Isola delle Rose), 1968–1969(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Passports and documents
- Sovereign Order of Malta, passports(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Free Republic of Liberland: FAQ(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Republic of Estonia, e-Residency(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Republic of Estonia: e-Residency(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- St Kitts and Nevis, Citizenship by Investment Unit(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Commonwealth of Dominica: Citizenship by Investment Unit(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- European Commission: list of known fantasy and camouflage passports(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Council of the EU (PRADO): travel documents and fantasy passports(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- W3C, Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0 (W3C Recommendation, 15 May 2025)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 on ecodesign requirements for sustainable products, art. 2(28): digital product passport(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Decision No 1105/2011/EU, art. 6: non-exhaustive list of known fantasy and camouflage passports(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Rights, privacy and courts
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), arts. 12, 19 and 20(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), arts. 17, 19 and 22(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UN Treaty Collection, status of the ICCPR (175 states parties, November 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UNCITRAL: status of the New York Convention (1958)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ICC International Court of Arbitration(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Companies, DAOs and AI
- J. P. Barlow: A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace (1996)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ICANN: stewardship of the IANA functions transitions (1 October 2016)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017 (New Zealand), s. 14(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Republic of the Marshall Islands, Decentralized Autonomous Organization Act 2022(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Wyoming: Decentralized Autonomous Organization Supplement (SF0038, 2021)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Companies Act No. 8 of 1994 (Cap. 143), PDF copy(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Companies Act No. 8 of 1994, web text (incorporations.io)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- CFTC press release 8715-23: Ooki DAO default judgment (2023)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- CFTC v. Ooki DAO, N.D. Cal., order of 20 December 2022(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Sarcuni v. bZx DAO, S.D. Cal., order of 27 March 2023(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Digital transactions
- UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts (2005), arts. 6, 10 and 12, with the UNCITRAL explanatory note(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce, arts. 2(c) and 3(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1042/2013: place of supply of electronic services from 1 January 2015(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Court of Justice of the EU, Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof, C-585/08 and C-144/09 (2010)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I), arts. 3 and 6(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., US Supreme Court, 21 June 2018(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UNIDROIT Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law (2023), Principle 5(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Law Commission of England and Wales, Digital assets and (electronic) trade documents in private international law, Consultation Paper No 273 (2025)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Lightning Labs, L402: Lightning HTTP 402 Protocol(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ICANN, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- United States v. Cohen, 260 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2001)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Taxation
- UAE Ministry of Finance, Corporate Tax(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: United Arab Emirates, individual income(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: United Arab Emirates, corporate income(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Panama, corporate income(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Cayman Islands, corporate income(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Bermuda, corporate income(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Cayman Islands, other taxes (no VAT)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Bermuda, other taxes (no VAT or sales tax)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Hong Kong SAR, other taxes (no VAT, GST or sales tax)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Hong Kong SAR, corporate income (territorial profits tax)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: Panama, other taxes (ITBMS, 7% VAT)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries: United Arab Emirates, other taxes (5% VAT)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Tax Foundation, State and Local Sales Tax Rates, 2026(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Licensing and protection
- Dubai VARA, licensed activities(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- VARA Company Rulebook(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Malta Gaming Authority, Player Protection Directive (Directive 2 of 2018)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UK Civil Aviation Authority, ATOL protection(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Coinbase Global, Inc., Form 8-K filed with the SEC, 15 May 2025(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Ledger: the July 2020 e-commerce and marketing data breach(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Jameson Lopp, Known physical bitcoin attacks (GitHub)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- FINRA, About FINRA(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- FINMA, Self-regulatory organisations (SROs)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- 15 U.S.C. § 78o-3, Registered securities associations(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ICANN, Accredited registrars(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ABTA, Who we are(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Trusted Shops, Buyer Protection(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, s. 24(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Securities Commission of The Bahamas, media release, 10 November 2022: Securities Commission of The Bahamas Freezes Assets of FTX(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Securities Commission of The Bahamas, media release, 14 November 2022: Securities Commission Update on FTX(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Testimony of John J. Ray III, CEO of the FTX Debtors, to the US House Financial Services Committee, 13 December 2022(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ESMA, Fast Track Peer Review on the application of the Guidelines on the Enforcement of Financial Information by BaFin and FREP in the context of Wirecard (ESMA42-111-5349, 3 November 2020)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Company registers and identity
- Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Corporate transparency and register reform: consultation (May 2019), paras. 32–33(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Companies House press release, 23 March 2018: UK’s ‘first ever’ successful prosecution for false company information(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Companies House press release, 5 August 2025: Companies House confirms identity verification rollout from 18 November 2025(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- UK Government, Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act: identity verification and authorised corporate service providers (factsheet, updated 1 March 2024)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- M. Findley, D. Nielson and J. Sharman, Global Shell Games: Testing Money Launderers’ and Terrorist Financiers’ Access to Shell Companies (Centre for Governance and Public Policy, Griffith University, 2012)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- ICIJ, 3 April 2016: Giant Leak of Offshore Financial Records Exposes Global Array of Crime and Corruption(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Offshore licensing
- Curaçao Gaming Authority, License fees under the National Ordinance on Games of Chance (v2.0, 15 October 2025)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Curaçao Gaming Authority, License conditions for an indefinite-term online gaming license (October 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Malta, Gaming Licence Fees Regulations (S.L. 583.03)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Gibraltar, Gambling (Duties and Licence Fees) Regulations 2026 (LN 2026/065)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Kahnawake Gaming Commission, Regulations concerning Interactive Gaming (as amended 25 March 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Financial Services Authority Seychelles, Virtual Asset Service Providers: FAQs(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Guernsey Financial Services Commission, Insurance fees (with effect from 1 January 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- incorporations.io (Flag Theory), offshore company formation prices(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Cayman Islands, Virtual Asset (Service Providers) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 (SL 19 of 2025)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Cayman Islands Monetary Authority, Fee Schedule (updated 20 October 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Bermuda Monetary Authority, Fees effective 1 January 2026(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- British Virgin Islands, Financial Services (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (SI 2023 No. 5)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Mauritius, Financial Services (Consolidated Licensing and Fees) Rules 2008, as at 1 July 2026(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Mauritius, Virtual Asset and Initial Token Offering Services (Capital and Other Financial Requirements) Rules 2022(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Financial Services Authority Seychelles, Guidance Notes for Paid-Up Capital (VASP), July 2026(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Seychelles, Virtual Asset Service Providers Act 2024 (Act 12 of 2024)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Seychelles, Securities (Forms and Fees) (Amendment of Second Schedule) Regulations 2024 (S.I. 120 of 2024)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Financial Services Authority Seychelles, Securities Dealer application guidelines (March 2026)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Financial Services Commission Belize, Licensing fees(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Vanuatu Financial Services Commission, Financial Dealers Licence: guidelines on application(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Vanuatu Financial Services Commission, Guidance notes for licence applications(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Malta, Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (Fees) Regulations (S.L. 647.01, L.N. 295 of 2024)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Marriage and marital agreements
- Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, para. 75(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Law Commission of England and Wales, Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements (Law Com No 343, 2014)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Uniform Law Commission, Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (2012), s. 9 and prefatory note(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- California Family Code § 1615(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- California Family Code § 1612(c)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Germany) § 1408(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Germany) § 1410(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Germany) § 1414(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Bundesverfassungsgericht, 1 BvR 12/92, 6 February 2001(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Service-Public.fr, Contrat de mariage (Code civil arts. 1536–1543)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 on matrimonial property regimes, arts. 22, 23 and 25(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Civil Code of Catalonia, Book Two (Ley 25/2010), arts. 231-10, 231-20 and 232-1(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Marriage Act 1949 (England and Wales), s. 26(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Avitzur v. Avitzur, 58 N.Y.2d 108 (N.Y. 1983)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Attorney General v Akhter and Khan [2020] EWCA Civ 122(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- K v A [2014] EWHC 3850 (Fam), para. 47(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- S v S [2014] EWHC 7 (Fam)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Arbitration Act 1996, s. 1(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Philosophy and principles
- John Locke, Second Treatise of Government (1690), § 95(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- David Hume, Of the Original Contract (1748)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Ernest Renan, Qu’est-ce qu’une nation ? (1882)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859), Project Gutenberg(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Volume 2 (1840), translated by Henry Reeve, Project Gutenberg(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- IETF, RFC 7282: On Consensus and Humming in the IETF (June 2014)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- World Bank, Identification for Development (ID4D)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- World Bank, The Global Findex Database 2025(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- MIT News, 8 December 2016: Study: Mobile-money services lift Kenyans out of poverty (on T. Suri and W. Jack, Science 354, 2016)(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
- Companies House blog, 3 July 2018: What is Companies House?(opens in a new tab) · Archived copy
Every source is captured in the Source archive with its capture time, SHA-256 fingerprint and an independent Internet Archive snapshot, so the case can be checked even if a source changes or disappears.